Monday, May 23, 2011

Dutch court's foolhardy attempt to introduce 'Insulting Islam' charge into Dutch legal system - rejects anti-Islam MP's bias claim

Dutch anti-Islam deputy Geert Wilders
stands in court next to his lawyer Bram Moszkowicz
on May 23, 2011 in Amsterdam
The Dutch courts could become like a portal for Muslim countries and groups to attempt to silence criticism of Islam ~ its objectives and its practises. We have free speech for a reason. The Dutch court seems to be seeking out a reason to break with this ~ for the purpose of making concessions to Islam [an ideology].

More the Islamic world is called 'not free' for a reason. And so there must be some acknowledgement that when people come from the Muslim world ~ that they bring with them the 'not so free' ideology and that many the will have the expectation that these repressive laws and norms be implemented in the west. That a significant portion of Muslim immigrants will reject the very idea of freedom and the right of the individual. That these newcomers identity is not only tied up with Islam as a religion ~ but as the law.

Its a religious thing ~ which they want to make a legal thing - but then Europe also becomes 'not so free'!!


THE HAGUE (AFP)— An Amsterdam court rejected a claim by far right leader Geert Wilders that an earlier court decision was biased and that hate speech charges against him should be dropped.
"The request is denied," said Judge Marcel van Oosten, during a hearing broadcast on the Internet by Dutch public television. "The trial must go on."

Wilders, 47, faces five counts of giving offence to Muslims and of inciting hatred against Muslims and people of non-Western immigrant origin, particularly Moroccans.

On May 2, Wilders' lawyer Bram Moszkowicz argued his client no longer had recourse to a fair trial and that charges against him should be dropped.

In 2008, prosecutors had initially dismissed dozens of complaints against Wilders but an appeals court reversed that decision.

Wilders' defence team claims that one of the judges involved in that decision, Tom Schalken, tried to persuade Arab world expert and defence witness Hans Jansen of supporting the trial at a 2010 dinner party.

"It isn't plausible that Schalken tried to influence Jansen," said Judge van Ousten. "We cannot conclude that the defendant's rights were violated."

The allegations against Wilders arise partly from the 2008 short film "Fitna", in which he mixes Koranic verses with footage of extremist attacks.

Wilders likens the Koran to Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf".

The MP, whose Party for Freedom came third in elections last year and gives parliamentary support to a right-leaning coalition, faces up to a year in jail or a 7,600 euro (10,300 dollar) fine for comments made in his campaign to "stop the Islamisation of The Netherlands."

No comments: