Friday, August 27, 2010
Islamophobia has been a myth ~ I struggle to see what Islamophobia is. Is it a physical attack? What I really see the term being used as a way to proselytize about Islam. If you object to some of the tenets of Islam ~ like those Koran verses that clearly call for violence against non-believers and the so-called moderate speakers and others who back them up with either support or silence ~ then you or your sentiment would be termed Islamophobic. You are supposed to look beyond the call to subjugate non-Muslims under Islam law ~ the lower status for women and see Islam's positive side ~ otherwise you are an Islamophobe. An extremely convenient term.
Even Muslim leaders have picked up on its power. The Pakistan leader is always talking about Islamophobia in the west. But in his country you can literally kill, rape, kidnap a Christian or Hindu without punishment. And don't even look sideways at a Muslim because you may soon find yourself being charged with blasphemy ~ with a 25 year prison sentence or death. The Libyan leader ~ interesting on his Islamic foundation site that builds mega mosques in far-flung places ~ makes reference to the 'racists' in Europe who reject Islam. Which gives a whole new dimention to these terms when used in relation to Islam ~ in that they are trying to browbeat us into acceptance of their outdated religious tenets.
The supposed anti-Muslim backlash among Americans is mostly a myth.
Here's a thought: The 70% of Americans who oppose what amounts to an Islamic Niketown two blocks from ground zero are the real victims of a climate of hate, and anti-Muslim backlash is mostly a myth.
Let's start with some data.
According to the FBI, hate crimes against Muslims increased by a staggering 1,600% in 2001. That sounds serious! But wait, the increase is a math mirage. There were 28 anti-Islamic incidents in 2000. That number climbed to 481 the year a bunch of Muslim terrorists murdered 3,000 Americans in the name of Islam on Sept. 11.
Now, that was a hate crime.
Regardless, 2001 was the zenith or, looked at through the prism of our national shame, the nadir of the much-discussed anti-Muslim backlash in the United States. The following year, the number of anti-Islamic hate-crime incidents (overwhelmingly, nonviolent vandalism and nasty words) dropped to 155. In 2003, there were 149 such incidents. And the number has hovered around the mid-100s or lower ever since.
Sure, even one hate crime is too many. But does that sound like a anti-Muslim backlash to you?
Let's put this in even sharper focus. America is, outside of Israel ,probably the most receptive and tolerant country in the world to Jews. And yet, in every year since 9/11, more Jews have been hate-crime victims than Muslims. A lot more.
In 2001, there were twice as many anti-Jewish incidents as there were anti-Muslim, again according to the FBI. In 2002 and pretty much every year since, anti-Jewish incidents have outstripped anti-Muslim ones by at least 6 to 1. Why aren't we talking about the anti-Jewish climate in America?
Because there isn't one. And there isn't an anti-Muslim climate either. Yes, there's a lot of heated rhetoric on the Internet. Absolutely, some Americans don't like Muslims. But if you watch TV or movies or read, say, the op-ed page of the New York Times — never mind left-wing blogs — you'll hear much more open bigotry toward evangelical Christians (in blogspeak, the "Taliban wing of the Republican Party") than you will toward Muslims.
No doubt some American Muslims — particularly young Muslim men with ties to the Middle East and South Asia — have been scrutinized at airports more than elderly women of Norwegian extraction, but does that really amount to Islamophobia, given the dangers and complexities of the war on terror?
Posted by Cole at 4:11 AM