Pat Condell: The crooked judges of Amsterdam [Video]

Pat's sobering message !! In a trial ~ if the truth doesn't matter and the right to free speech doesn't matter ~ then what does?

That is why for a conviction the court needs to establish that criticism of Islam = racism. Wilders defence is that the criticism is true [9:29] - and the court responds by significantly limiting Wilders witnesses and hearing them in private or in closed session.

Something more than slightly suspicious about this - it is not hard to imagine that the trial outcome has already been set ~ and we are simply going through the motions.

There is no law that states that criticism of Islam is the same as racial hatred towards Muslims - and indeed whenever Wilders has been given the opportunity he has expressed the opposite sentiment towards Muslims in Holland [who want to be Dutch ~ not establish a Shari'a state].

While the Dutch authorities sit comfortably against Wilders at the moment ~ the big quest is what will 'offend' Islam next time!

If certain Left-wing elements of the country want to live under Shari'a law and love, love, love its benefits - they should be asked to keep this as a personal matter and they should not try to impose their new new legal vision on the whole country. As many in Europe - find it 'offensive' to have long held rights overturned - in favour of the Shari'a-like laws.


Europe's cultural inquisition begins.

Geert Wilders on trial
http://www.wildersontrial.com/

Geert Wilders' statement in court
http://europenews.dk/en/node/29245