Sunday, November 29, 2009

Switzerland risks Muslim backlash after minarets vote'

video

What leg does the Islamic nations have to stand on - in each of their countries they make it extremely difficult if not impossible for anyone to build a church or other non-Muslim holy place - I think clearly the rest of the world are catching up to their game. If for example - as many in Europe have travelled to the Islamic world - and saw that other religions were being tolerated - then they could argue Muslims have churches there and we have mosques there. But if you visit the Islamic world - you will see that the few churches that you do see are under heavy restrictions - and very often Muslims from those countries are not allowed in them - it is simply illegal to enter inside. But yet Muslim want rights to freely practise their religion everywhere else. Someone is going to have to say - when it comes to religious tolerance - the Islamic World has no clothes.

The legally-binding referendum result had not been widely expected and was a huge embarrassment for the neutral government in Switzerland.

In the run-up to the vote it had warned that a ban would "serve the interests of extremist circles" and damage economic ties with Muslim states.

Anti-immigrant right-wing populists had championed the vote and led an emotive campaign. The Swiss People's Party (SVP), the country's largest in terms of popular support and membership in parliament, used posters depicting a woman in a burka in front of minarets shaped like missiles rising from a Swiss flag.

"We're enormously happy. It is a victory for this people, this Switzerland, this freedom and those who want a democratic society," Walter Wobmann, president of the initiative committee, said in a victory speech. "We just want to stop further Islamisation in Switzerland."

As recently as two weeks ago, opinion polls showed 53 per cent would reject the ban and just 37 per cent would support it. But yesterday's results showed a swing to 57.5 per cent in favour (1.534 million people), 42.5 per cent against (1.135 million people) and 22 of the 26 cantons also in support of the initiative.

Switzerland uses direct democracy for single-issue politics, meaning citizens have the last word on many important political decisions.

The backing from both cantons and voters means the words "the construction of minarets is forbidden" will be added to article 72 of the country's constitution.
In many places support reached more than 60 per cent and in Appenzell Innerrhoden province it was 71 per cent.

Taner Hatipoglu, president of the Federation of Islamic Organisations in Zurich, said: "The initiators have achieved something everyone wanted to prevent, and that is to influence and change the relations to Muslims and their social integration in a negative way."

Andreas Gross, president of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, called the ban a "slap in the face to everyone who has an idea of the human rights."

He said: "This is clearly the result of a lack of information and political education in Switzerland. As a result the voters have been misdirected by their emotions. The foundations of Switzerland's direct democracy have failed."

Yesterday's referendum was sparked by a planning application by Muslims in the town of Langenthal, in the canton of Bern, asking for planning permission to add a 30ft minaret to their mosque. What began as a debate about an architectural structure snowballed into an issue about the position of Muslims in Switzerland.

The vote was triggered when almost 115,000 signed a people's initiative handed to parliament last year in favour of a ban – 100,000 is enough to force a referendum in Switzerland.

Ulrich Schlüer, of the SVP, said: "The minaret has got nothing to do with religion. It's a symbol of political power, a prelude to the introduction of sharia law.

"They are symbols of an Islam which wants to establish a legal and social order fundamentally contrary to the liberties guaranteed in our constitution.

"We compare our situation to Germany, France or England the problems they have in their suburbs. That is what we do not want."

The minaret campaign was denounced by the government but it said it would respect the people's decision.

Justice Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf said: "The initiative is a kind of proxy war. Its supporters say they are against minarets. But they want to fight what they consider creeping Islamisation and sharia law."

About 400,000 – 5 per cent – of Swiss residents are Muslims and of about 150 mosques or Islamic prayer houses in Switzerland, only four have minarets.

Swiss citizens are called to cast their votes several times every year. They have the final say on specific issues, amending the constitution and challenging parliamentary decisions.

The only case in which parliament can override this right is if it decides that the motion being proposed is unconstitutional or if it violates international law.

In the run-up to yesterday's vote, tensions ran high. In Geneva last week a mosque was vandalised by individuals who threw pink paint at the entrance.

Many Swiss businesses, particularly those with large interests in Muslim countries, came out against the referendum, for fear of a boycott like one that hit Denmark in 2005 following a controversy over published cartoons of the prophet Muhammad.

Switzerland risks Muslim backlash after minarets vote' - Telegraph

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The argument that Switzerland should impose restictions on religious freedom because Islamic nations also restict religious freedom is a poor argument. Apart from the rhetorical rebuttal that two wrongs do not make a right, it seems obvious that the way of upholding the values of the society is best done by universally applying those values. If tolerance and freedom of religion are valued, then they must be extended even to the intolerant (ignoring the fact that tolerant Muslims are also injured by this ban). It is true that many nations do not cherish human rights to the same degree as the Swiss, but does that mean that Switzerland should therefore strive to be more like Iran?

Cole said...

But also sometimes it is important to play hardball! The Muslims are clearly playing us - they are using our rights and freedoms to impose - what they feel is right for Europe - Islamic law!

Europeans are growing tired of the calls to be tolerant - of Islamic intolerance. While no one requests that the Muslim world do the same! Only how many ways can we not offend them - while they continue to offend us!

Canada said...

It isn't an argument that two wrongs make a right. A while back the Saudis were celebrating the conversion of 200 Chinese to Islam. Other wealthy countries like the U.E. do not embrace other cultures. More of an unlevel playing ground.