Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Australians deal with aftermath of anti-Innocence of Muslims film riots + child holding behead those who insult Islam sign - Video

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Inside the Muslim Mindset: What is Forbidden - Versus Western Laws & Norms

Muslim sentiment ~ is Islamic law.

To Muslims in Islam - the world and everybody in it is divided into two categories - those who do what is forbidden and those who don't.

Western society is based on choice.


You can choose to do what is forbidden in Islam.

Don't be confused - Islamic laws are not based on the simple laws that govern Christianity - Love thy neighbor - Do unto others as you would have them do unto you - which if practiced provides for harmony between people - all people.

Conversely a Muslim can break with Islamic laws - if one is good to their neighbor - who is doing what is forbidden in Islam.

This is where we ask - why are they attacking this person and saying they are not a good Muslim. Isn't Islam like Christianity - all they do is pray differently?

And in Islam there are penalties for breaking with these laws - [there is not only fear of god there is fear of people element] Listen - and you will hear the moderate Muslims - who want to be good and respectful to others - point to a long roundabout list of Koran and other verses to justify their actions - it is almost sounds like a haggling process - to demonstrate that they are not doing what is forbidden - by treating the non-Muslim - say with respect.


Here is where the dangers come - in trying to back Islam - for solutions to the problem of Islam in the modern world - because most of these people base their understanding on Islam on family tradition - but also in play are the demands of normal human interaction - versus when we say a person has become 'radicalized' whenever - they are shown - by the so-called 'hate' preachers - who simply reel off the Koran and Hadiths chapter and verse - what they as Muslims are really supposed to be doing. This could result in a person  joining with the Islamic militancy - but it could also result in a person making brazen attacks on the norms in western society - in an attempt to dismantle all the things which are forbidden in Islam. 


Like mixed swimming - where for example, Muslims in Europe have repeatedly requested that everyone abide by the Islamic laws that forbids this - so that in the end - piece by innocuous piece - an Islamic state will emerge - with all the norms and customs of western society forbidden - naturally this is heavily dependent on those in western society who would agree that all things that 'offend' Islam should be gotten rid off - out of 'respect' for it.


 This was at the heart of the issue with Islam in Europe, that has now moved to America.


There are other rules - a true Muslim can befriend others - or those who do what is forbidden - if he engages in Dawa - or the spreading or promotion of the Islamic message. [There was for example one Muslim political editor who focused most of his articles - in a Left-wing political magazine on 'educating' people on Islam *- with an obsessive regularity.] Demonstrating how non-Muslim friendships or associations - could be used gain advantage - to advance Islam [politic].


This rule extends even further - there is a very interesting speech by Mark Durie - who found that according to the highest authority of Islam in Saudi Arabia - a Muslim is only allowed to live in non-Muslims lands - if they engage in the spreading of Islam. This informative lecture can be heard here.  

In addition all Muslim groups who claim not to support 'terrorism' - may not be doing so for the reasons that we think. It may not be militarily expedient to go to war - especially when you can achieve the same ends - for an Islamic state by political means or other social pressure - no doubt anti-racism groups would be seen as extremely helpful in this regard.

*The 'education' of non-Muslims lends itself to the Islamic concept of 'Ignorance'. Before Islam there was the 'Age of Ignorance' and since then everything outside of it is considered 'ignorant' - including people. Because there are so many aspects of Muslim behavior that comes out of this concept - that there need be another dedicated post or essay for it. 

The learning or teaching of Islam - is allowed or encouraged - because we think we are doing away with 'racism' - but this is in line with the Islamic belief that - all that is not within Islam is inferior or 'ignorant'. [The 'education' would be seen as helping non-Muslims in this regard.] Conversely there is the belief that - with Islam and all who are in it - are superior. 

Where in the west - this might be expressed as a healthy disregard for all that is not Muslim or of Islam. 

But in the Muslim world this sentiment - is the law - and the dhimmi laws - or laws for example - which do not allow a non-Muslim president - or place limits on the civil rights of Christians and others - is where this 'healthy disregard' for others - that would be behind the Muslims' firm reluctance to integrate - here in the west - becomes a part of the body of law or constitution in Islamic countries.



Which means that the most trusted of 'moderate' Muslim voices - would say - I do what I do - because I want to do it. Or rather - I don't want to do that.

And I am afraid - I think this is the only way out.

The honesty of independent thought that would be seen as blasphemous in the Islamic world - forms the cornerstone of western society. 

Behind Muslim "Hurt Feelings" Is Islamic Law

That's right Muslim sentiment ~ is Islamic law.
If you've been paying any attention to the media (not just this week, but for at least the last several years), you might get the idea that Muslims in the Middle East are pretty excitable people, given to quick offense and "hurt feelings" at any slight against their prophet, holy book or legal code.

The very same "hurt feelings" emerge when the pretext is a cartoon, a book, or even US counter-terror policy, like outlawing material support for terrorist organizations. Over years, Islamist pressure groups in the US have taught the Obama administration how to apologize for every slight to Islam's honor; the US government has learned it so well, they've internalized the process of continuous apology and have endeavored to preempt the "hurt feelings" of Islamists at home and abroad.

But Muslims are really no more sensitive and fragile than the rest of us. "Hurt feelings," is what the western media needs to label something they don't understand, and are afraid to learn.

Last week's violence in the Middle East-- and, indeed, so much of it for the last several years-- is only because this movie (or whatever pretext, cartoons, etc.) runs afoul of mainstream Islamic shariah law of slander and blasphemy. "Hurt feelings" or "feeling offended" is the way the west processes this phenomenon, but it's far from what we, in our world of conflict resolution, psychotherapy, and Montessori education have come to understand as such.

Regardless of the actual history and provenance of the film (and we should not discount the possibility of it being concocted by Salafists as a kind of blasphemous false flag), "Innocence of Muslims" appears to violate a principle absolutely clear to any practicing Muslim who knows the law.

How Islamic law on blasphemy gets to be what it is is interesting in itself. Briefly, the consensus of scholars in Islam (i.e., what is required to establish a final, unalterable ruling on a subject) have agreed that, one who blasphemes against Islam, in effect, engages in slander against the religion ("Slander [ghiba] means to mention anything concerning a person [a Muslim] that he would dislike," according to a canonical Shaf'i jurist al Misri) and places a Muslim in the category of apostate, for which the punishment is death. An example (not from the misty past, but from 2007) illustrates this concisely:
If a Muslim commits blasphemy against the Prophet, this is an act of disbelief which takes him out of the fold of Islam. Allaah Says (what means): {Make no excuse; you have disbelieved [i.e. rejected faith] after your belief. If We pardon one faction of you—We will punish another faction because they were criminals.}[Quran 9:66] If joking is considered as an act of apostasy, then it is more confirmed for one who is saying it intentionally. If the blasphemer does not repent, he should be killed for his apostasy. However, if he sincerely repents to Allaah, Allaah will accept his repentance. Repentance expiates all sins, even Shirk (associating partners to Allaah). Allaah Knows best." [Blasphemy against the Prophet is an act of apostasy. Islam Web Fatwa Center, Fatwa No. 17316, December 11, 2007]

Monday, September 17, 2012

Blasphemy: The Obama Assault on 'Inalienable Rights'

A young Australian mother takes a photo of her child holding a sign that threatens to decapitate those who insult Islam - during the Australian-Muslim anti-film protests.

With signs like this - how could one argue that Muslims are experiencing difficulty practicing their faith
- in the free world.

What is is clear is that they view it as a apart of their religion to enforce its laws on others.
And this is violation of the freedoms we believe in.

Remember the old Obama used to say his father said "Islam was Hocus Pocus" - now the new Obama would seek to criminalize his own father's exercise of his freedom of conscience.

Obama is trying to give the Muslims what they want and it seems is prepared to hand everything we value - away in the process. So 'he' can look good in the Muslim world.

Muslims around the world rioted similarly when the Pope spoke as well - who will be next?

A dose of truth - might be what Muslims need - because indeed Islam outside of a religious practice has failed them.


Barack Obama swore an oath to defend the United States Constitution… not just the parts he likes, and not just when it’s convenient for him. Is he capable of fulfilling that oath, or not?

The L.A. Times confirms an astonishing rumor flying around the Internet on Friday morning, concerning the Obama Administration’s willingness to serve Muslim rioters as the enforcement arm of unwritten blasphemy laws: “In a sign of the tensions the movie has sparked, Los Angeles County officials said the U.S. State Department had asked them not to release copies of the film permits [for “The Innocence of Muslims”] containing information about who organized the shoot.  Obama administration officials also flagged the trailer to YouTube and asked the company to review whether it violated the website’s terms of service.
A limit to free speech has been established, and the Administration is willing to help foreign powers enforce it.
This is not an entirely new development.  The Heritage Foundation recalls that “As recently as December 19, 2011, the U.S. voted for and was instrumental in passing ‘U.N. Resolution 16/18’ against ‘religious intolerance,’ ‘condemning the stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization of people based on their religion.’ While this may sound innocuous, it was the latest incarnation of a highly controversial ‘anti-blasphemy’ resolution that has been pushed by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) at the United Nations since 1999.”
This concept of global “blasphemy laws,” to which the Obama Administration is very obviously not hostile, is a long-cherished goal of Islamic supremacists.  It is also Constitutional sacrilege.  The version supported by this President and his people contains a few rhetorical flourishes toward freedom of speech: “We must denounce offensive speech whenever we encounter it – but our commitment to universal principles makes clear that faith must never be a crime and religion must never be used as an excuse to stifle freedom of expression,” as U.S. ambassador at large Suzan Johnson Cook put it.

Friday, September 14, 2012

Ah... Hillary the Muhammad Film You Called "Disgusting and Reprehensible" is Based on Islamic Sources

As Hillary Clinton - inadvertently points out of the portrayal of Muhammad in the film.

The question therefore is what is "disgusting and reprehensible" about Muhammad's life?

This blog will try to show how the contents of the 'Muhammad Movie' match up with the Islamic accounts in the Hadiths and Koran -

The Hadiths are worst than the film:

Be prepared ~ apologize for some of it - in advance.



The issue of Muhammad's desire for young children - and his promotion of this:

Muhammad endorses marrying virgins for the extra-thrill it gives a grown man.

Narrated Jabir bin Abdullah: When I got married, Allah’s Apostle said to me, "What type of lady have you married?" I replied, "I have married a matron." He said, "Why, don’t you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?" Jabir also said: Allah's Apostle said, ‘Why didn't you marry a young girl so that you might play with her and she with you?’[14]

The Islamic tax called "extortion" in the film well known to many - is call the jizya tax in Islam - and it was collected in the Muslim world up until the time of western colonization. For example in the Ottoman Empire - where "Christians and Muslims got along peaceably" - Christian's paid the jizya tax.

Now only in the tribal regions of Pakistan do Hindus and Sikhs pay this tax. It is a protection tax - very similar to the Mafia version - because payment of it ensures the non-Muslims protection - in any Islamic state.
Qur'an (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

This is a call for Muslims to fight until others accept Islam - the claim that there is - no compulsion in Islam - is called into question here.
Sahih Muslim (1:33) The Messenger of Allah said: "I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer and pay zakat [Arabic ~ tithes for Muslims]."

In the film an old man refuses to accept Muhammad as the Prophet of God and spits in disgust - here is an Islamic account of the leader of a tribe who did convert - and when brought before Muhammad - is told by the Prophet exactly what would have happened if he had not accepted:
Muhammad sent Khalid Ibn al-Walid to the tribe of the children of Haritha and told him: "Call them to accept Islam before you fight with them. If they respond, accept that from them, but if they refuse, fight them." Khalid told them: "Accept Islam and spare your life." They entered Islam by force. He brought them to Muhammad. Muhammad said to them: "Had you not accepted Islam I would have cast your heads under your feet"

Here is an Islamic verse - which not only embraces the idea of Islamic supremacy - it calls for the demoralizing treatment or even enslavement of the non-Muslim:
Bukhari (60:80) - "The Verse:--'You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.' means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam."

The taking of non-Muslims women as slaves - a shocking Hadith where Muhammad orders his men to rape non-Muslim women - even as they did not want to. And a Koran verse is borne in the process.
The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives.
Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)

As in the film - those who mocked the Prophet  [read: talked sense] - should be killed:
“…two singing-girls Fartana and her friend who used to sing satirical songs about the apostle, so he ordered that they should be killed…” (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 819)

Cross dressing accounts [to each his own!]:
Fr. Botros: “Perhaps Muslims think that he only dressed in Aisha’s clothes? Being that she was his “favorite,” perhaps after being intimate with her, he would merely lay in bed with her clothes?” (Here the priest put his face in his hands lamenting that he had to talk of such shameful things.)
Then he offered an interesting and revealing hadith, from Sahih Bukhari (2/911), which records Muhammad saying, “Revelations [i.e., the Koran] never come to me when I’m dressed in women’s clothing—except when I’m dressed in Aisha’s,” implying that it was something of a habit for the prophet to dress in female clothing.

Homosexuality Islamic accounts:
Thus Botros [*Coptic Priest who runs a radio show in Arabic*], after profusely apologizing to his Muslim viewers, saying how embarrassing this was for him, declared: “Look! We’re merely readers here, bringing up what we have read in Islam’s own books! If Muslims don't like it, they should go and burn these books.
The first anecdote discussed by the priest revolved around a hadith that, while some ulema say is “weak,” is, nonetheless according to Botros, present in 44 Islamic books—including some highly respected collections, such as Sunan Bayhaqi and Al Halabi.
According to this hadith, a man named Zahir, who used to declare that “the prophet loves me,” said that one day Muhammad crept unawares behind him and put him in a bear-hug. Zahir, alarmed, yelled, “Get off me!” After turning his head and discovering that it was Muhammad, he stopped struggling and proceeded to “push his back into the prophet’s chest—prayers and blessings upon him."
Another curious hadith contained in Sunan Bayhaqi and which traces to Sunan Abu Dawud (one of the six canonical hadith collections), has Muhammad lifting up his shirt for a man who proceeded to kiss his entire torso, “from his bellybutton to his armpits.”

The adoption scandal in Islam:

 In short Muhammad covets his stepson's wife - as portrayed in the film - thereafter no adoptions were allowed in Islam:
ALLAH MADE ZAYD DIVORCE ZAYNAB and marry the Prophet(P) to remove the barrier set up by ties of adoption and invalidating its customs. He says, "Muhammad is not the father of any of your men." (33:40) And He says, "So that there would not be any fault for the believers regarding the wives of their adopted sons." (33:37)
Abû`l-Lâyth as-Samarqândî said that if people ask what is the benefit in the Prophet(P) commanding Zayd to keep Zaynâb when Allâh had informed him that she was to be his wife, it is that the Prophet(P) forbade Zayd to divorce his wife because of the disharmony between Zayd and her while concealing in himself what Allâh had informed him about. When Zayd divorced her, her [sic] FEARED THAT PEOPLE WOULD SAY HE WAS MARRYING HIS SON'S WIFE, so Allâh commanded him to marry her to make what he was doing lawful for his community as Allâh said, "So that there would not be any fault for the believers regarding the wives of their adopted sons." (33:37)

[Haven't even touched on the donkey accounts. In one in which the donkey speaks back to him - he asks the donkey 'does it lust for females'. (+)

 That some envision that we are to come under the laws of this man makes it all the more shocking!! It would otherwise be a spiritual comedy - if it wasn't so deadly!


This is a little different from ~ my belief is different from yours - so I disagree with your belief here or there - these verses are a call to attack those who don't believe as you do - and bring harm to those who question or satire your beliefs - it is as though we are forced not to ignore it. 

The people of the Muslim world lost their freedom a long time ago - after these laws were imposed on them. In light of the rules of the Shari'a - we must not take the protection of our freedoms lightly. Muslims are the most afraid and we are now only beginning to understand their fear - of Islam. 

[If you are a "good Muslim" - you need not be afraid - what other religion has such a rule?]

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Romney Spells it Out for Obama - on Libya Response!

“It's disgraceful that the Obama Administration's first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks”, Romney said. 
The following morning at a campaign office in Jacksonville, Florida, Romney elaborated on his remarks, digging his heels in as he told reporters, “I think it’s a terrible course for America to stand in apology for our values, that instead when our grounds are being attacked and being breached, that the first response of the United States must be outrage.”
Even if the the timing of the statement may have been wrong - it does speak to the spirit of the Obama administration typical response to murderous attacks on US personnel.
Romney’s comments stemmed from a statement issued by the United States Embassy in Cairo, appealing for religious tolerance after protests erupted outside diplomatic buildings in both Egypt and Libya over a video made by a US citizen deriding the Prophet Mohammed. The statement, which condemned “the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims”, was released before the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi. [France 24]
As US soldiers are being killed in cold blood - the stress of Ramadan is blamed. Enough with the lectures on Islam - what about what we believe? 

I thought that the new/emerging Obama response was in part shaped by political pressure - away from the film more onto the rebels and those weapons - and even Clinton seems to have tightened up her remarks. As she sits with her counterpart from the moderate Muslim police state of Morocco - where you are jailed for leaving your religion of Islam! [Imagine police knocking on your door for this!!]

It is understandable that what will follow if Muslim nations succeed in getting rid of our freedom of speech - they will not be able to resist the temptation to go after our freedom of religion and conscience.

Yes, these nice Muslim people, who like to shop [for all the 'ignorant' people who can't understand these complex issues] - don't believe in the freedoms that we do!!

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Exploring Hillary Clinton's Sticky Icky Connection w/ Muslim Brotherhood Sister Huma Abedin

Huma' Dear

Rehash!! But just can't get my head around the idea that - that Clinton's closest aide has direct links to the Muslim Brotherhood and connections to an organization which has as its aims to bring the US under Islamic law.

Let's assume she just randomly found a job with Hilary Clinton!!

Between Huma'Dear, Lil'Dalia and their other Muslim Brotherhood "friends" would go some way to explain the naivety in their dealings with the Muslim world. These advisers have religious-political interests.

The article below deals with Huma-Dear's mother's Muslim Brotherhood connections - but first is an excerpt that exposes Huma's father's House of Saud connection - this is like having Tariq Ramadan - grandson of the MB founder - as a close aide or advisor to the President - too bad about that terror charity scandal - he might have got the job:


There are those particularly on the Left rallying around Islam - trying to protect it from criticism - but maybe they don't understand - these are the things we criticize!!


Colour coordinated - strict attention to detail?
The Huma Abedin-House of Saud Connection Exposed

... My findings all started as I was researching Huma’s father “Sayed Zaynul Abedin” in Arabic looking for further clues and suddenly there it was, an unbelievable document commissioned by the late King Fahd bin Abdul Aziz which can be downloaded [here] and [here]. I couldn’t believe my eyes. It had a long grandiose and fanciful title: The Efforts of the Servant of the Two Holy Places to Support The Muslim Minorities. It included Huma’s father and his work Muslim Minorities in the West published in 1998 as part of 29 works to construct this conspiratorial manifesto. (#11. P. 134) It explained the Muslim Minority Affairs (hereafter MMA) not simply as a title or as a religious or social entity but as a Saudi foreign policy of the Ministry of Religious Affairs. It is an entire management system using MMA as the vehicle to catapult MMA to gain specific goals:

1—Recruit individual Muslims that live in non-Muslim lands and transform them as a collective unit by establishing centers, educational programs, mosques and organizations like ISNA and MSA in order to stop Muslim assimilation in non-Muslim host nations.

2—These then can influence the non-Muslim host nations by shifting the demographic scale due to their population growth in favor of the Saudi agenda.

3—A gradual implementation of Sharia will ensue by becoming a major revolutionary powerhouse.

4—This will tilt the host nation in favor of Muslims due to their increase as a population.

5—By this, a transformation then ensues in the host nation to gradually begin to implement a Wahhabi style Sharia.

 6—The host state then will join the Muslim commonwealth.

Sam Bacile's "The Innocence of Muslims - Muhammad Movie" - A Classic - Video



That Muslims find aspects the Prophet Muhammad's life offensive to Islam - says a lot - about the faith.

This is the Hadiths - and taken from actual Islamic accounts.

 Very good film - a lot of humor and beautifully done!

Saturday, August 25, 2012

New Libya - Salafists Destroy Asmar Sufi Shrine - Video


Incredible how the fundamental Islamists always end up in charge - while - most of the country sits and watches.

Got rid of Gaddafi - but at what cost?
Libyan authorities have struggled to control a myriad of armed factions that have refused to give up their weapons following the revolution that ousted Muammar Gaddafi last year.
Why would they give up the guns!!

Hardliners, emboldened and armed by the Arab Spring revolts, have targeted a number of sites sacred to Islam's mystical Sufi tradition in Libya, Egypt and Mali over the past year.

The assaults recalled the 2001 dynamiting by the Taliban of two 6th-century statues of Buddha carved into a cliff in Bamiyan in central Afghanistan.

It is a big question - what if the Muslims in that region attempted to destroy the pyramids? Would we go to war for that?? There might be other options - like if you take out those - then we may take out something that is important to you. And perhaps make sure the Saudis - understand that!
A Facebook page titled "Together for the Removal of the Abdel Salam al-Asmar Shrine" congratulated supporters on the "successful removal of the Asmar shrine, the largest sign of idolatry in Libya."

(Reuters) - Ultra-conservative Islamists used bombs and a bulldozer to destroy the tomb of a 15th century Sufi scholar in the Libyan city of Zlitan, witnesses said on Saturday, the latest attack in the region on sites branded idolatrous by some sects.

The attackers reduced the revered last resting place of Abdel Salam al-Asmar to rubble on Friday and also set fire to a historic library in a nearby mosque, ruining thousands of books, witnesses and a military official added.

A Reuters journalist in Zlitan, about 160 km (90 miles) west of the Libyan capital, said the mosque's dome had collapsed and a minaret was pockmarked with holes.

Jordanian Paralympic Team Members Charged with Sexual Assault - Ireland

Muslim men from Islamic regions are simply not required to respect women - outside of the narrow confines for set for them. They claim they 'respect' women - but this usually means inside the home - owned or controlled like a sheep.

Earlier this year in another case of a Muslim male - showing that he had no idea how to deal with women or more females - outside of the home.

An Iranian diplomat found to have groped under-age girls in Brazil swimming pool.
Press reports said the unnamed [Iranian] diplomat was accused of inappropriately touching girls aged between nine and 14 in a swimming pool at a Brasilia club.... [+]
A diplomat - groping a 9 year old! 
"This mission says that the charge against an Iranian diplomat is a misunderstanding due to differences in cultural behavior," the Iranian embassy said in a statement sent to AFP.

Here again sexual assaults against children - somehow seeming normal or permissible within an [Islamic] cultural context.
Two wheelchair-using power-lifters and their trainer appeared at Coleraine Magistrates' Court on Wednesday facing charges including sexual assault and voyeurism. [...]

Just to let them know - we have these other laws!

The men were arrested on Monday in the town of Antrim, northwest of Belfast, after three women lodged complaints.

Power lifter Omar Sami Qaradhi, 31, faces three charges of sexual assault, two against a child, and one of voyeurism after allegedly entering a women's changing room at the team's training centre at the Antrim Forum leisure center.

Police said he was identified by a 14-year-old girl who claimed that she posed for photos with him before he groped her between the legs in Antrim town centre.

The same day, a girl aged 16 said she was walking along the river path beside the team's training base at Antrim Forum with a friend when their path was blocked by the three accused.

Police alleged that the girl was pushed by one of the men towards Omar, who placed his arm around her waist and tightened his grip, but then she ran away.


Thursday, August 16, 2012

Lebanon's Hezbollah open theme park to introduce children to the glories of suicide attack - Video



Lebanese militant group Hezbollah has built a multi-million pound theme park designed to indoctrinate its children about the glory of martyrdom against its enemy Israel. The mostly-outdoor museum features barbed wire, tanks, rockets, archive video footage and a lot of guns. Visitors are able to walk around replica war scenes that feature destroyed Israeli tanks - including one symbolically rendered impotent by a twisted firing barrel - and grave stones lying on their side. [+]

Hezbollah Theme Park pics.

Koran & Gun

Mothers entertain great crime against children

A family affair!

Islamic militancy of the religion's highest order

Possibly EU Far-Left - out for a strole in Hezbollah heartland. So long as it says 'Islam' on the label.

Indoctrination: The concept of 'resistance tourism' is taken to its logical conclusion

Gift shop: Visitors can buy tourist-friendly items such as this cap featuring Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah
 

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Muslim Brotherhood 'Moderate' Spokesperson in the West - Takes Different Tone in Egypt - Video


Former Spokesman of the Muslim Brotherhood in the West Kamal Helbawy: America Will Be Brought to Its Knees

The same speaker Kamal Helbawy below: 2011 In the bbc video below. MB exposé -
Sayyid Qutb
"It's a widespread suspicion... that the Muslim Brotherhood puts up people like you to sound and look moderate - and to cover the fact that you are a highly extremist Islamist organization"

Prominent member of the Muslim Brotherhood Sayyid Qutb - attended school in the US in the 40's - thought that America should be destroyed - because it was too decadent - and this was before the Palestinian Israeli conflict.
Get Adobe Flash player

Saturday, August 4, 2012

US: Parents Protest CAIR's Islam Indoctrination in Tampa Schools




And video 2 - about 3 mins in ex-CAIR member tells of time in the US - and what he really thinks about the 'moderate' Islam - being preached. 


Obviously someone is being taken for a fool - but must we allow the children to be involved?




Friday, July 27, 2012

Olympic Update: God’s Chosen Men: The Saudis Allow Women in Olympics!

God’s chosen men the Saudis allowed their women folk to join the Olympics for the first time this year!!

Praise the Lord - Hallelujah – Let those women go!!

With special permission granted from the highest male authority on women in Arabia – the women were allowed required permission – a note signed by their male guardians [fathers or husbands] - to board a plane to leave the utopian enclave – for the London 2012 Olympics.

[Small print – if these Saudi women were ever lucky enough to earn sponsorship deals from their taking part in the Olympics – their checks would have to be signed over to their male guardians – who would allot them portions of their earnings as and when they see fit.]



What's Up with the 'Pokistan' Team

Did anyone see the Pakistan Olympic team flag bearer – who looked more like he was heading up Team Jihad!! With a serious look on his bearded face he seemed to be praying / muttering – finding himself in the midst of all these infidels – he might have been saying – I’ve got Chinese to the left of me and Americans to the right!!

It was a battle he was preparing for no doubt!

It seems those Arab nations – entering women for the first time - got together to consult on the women’s dress – black with a dash of tradition – but no burqa – Muslim women in the west must feel betrayed – as many of them choose to go backwards – the Saudis move forward – even if it is by one inch.

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Pat Condell: Hello Saudi Arabia - Video



In that region - Saudi male-on-male activities is the biggest joke!!

 As well as - if you are a visiting blond male.....

But the outward illusion is so great - they spend billions to make us like them!!!

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Rumors of War III - Radical Totalitarian Ideology - Video

Must watch.

Gulf War Kuwait imposes death sentence for 'insulting' Islam, Allah, the Prophet and Wives

Islam shackles its own first!
While Muslim countries try to get the west to control and monitor what is said about Islam - they introduce the death penalty - even Muhammad's many wives were thrown into the lot - for protection from any and all criticism and scrutiny.

As a route to paradise!!


“The government is now in the process of establishing laws that will allow government entities to regulate the use of the different new media outlets such as Twitter in order to safeguard the cohesiveness of the population and society,” Information Minister Sheikh Mohammad al-Mubarak Al-Sabah stated.

CAIRO: Regional human rights organizations expressed concern over Kuwait’s recently passed law that mandates the death penalty to anyone who criticizes God or Islam’s prophet Mohammed or his wives. The Kuwaiti National Assembly passed the law last Thursday, April 12, confirming the capital punishment to those insulting or criticizing God, the prophet or any of his wives, specially from the Muslim community in the country. A number of assembly members asked for consultation with the Ministry of Justice and Muslim scholars over the law first, before implementing it.

“This law pulls freedom of opinion and expression a hundred steps back in Kuwait, as it will restrict freedom of expression significantly, and will make all citizens threatened with death, based on their opinions and what they write, as on the other hand the law can be used by authorities to get rid of opponents, as it’s a vague expansion of the use of the words, such as daring or abuse,” said the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information (ANHRI) on Thursday.

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Nonie Darwish at Islamic Apartheid Conference at Temple University - Video



Nonie Darwish Islamic Apartheid Conference" at Temple University

CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood group - organized the protest at the conference [nevermind them]

This video is good!!

Really the whole thing.

On honor killing, fgm and speaking out about it - in a hostile environment where you can be called a racist for recounting your own story - if it has anything to do with Islam - and it is not the flowery version - that places the cloth over the lumps [to give the appearance of smoothness - see it's smooth!!].

"Since when does America make insulting a religion a crime - I am ashamed."
She makes necessary and valid points but namely - is the reclaiming of Egypt's history. When women ruled, like the women Pharaohs and others like the Queen of Sheba - before the advent of Islam - which apparently - it claims - set women free - only there is a long list of things you just can't do - except with special permission!! [None of which the regions former Queens would have found acceptable - half of what!!]

With all Islam's talk - virtually no one goes to Egypt - to see the things Islam has done. Only those things from the so called 'age of ignorance'* or before Islam - are of interest! So as Nonie Darwish points out - Islam has taken Egypt backwards - and as she warns - our high ideals are being compromised even now.

This is not a game folks!

There is a play on words - it is called an anti-Islamic debate - but in actual fact it is pro-Islamic. It is a discussion to say what Islam is. So long as it is played as anti-Islamic - groups like CAIR can hide behind it - but for those in the Islamic world they don't have a clue - anyone who has been - knows it is like politically incorrect central. -

It is not an anti-Islamic debate and it is not even criticism - it's exposure. That many Muslims would rather you did not hear.

*In Islam anything outside of it - is considered ignorant - which includes 'people' and time periods. 'People as in - if you are not a Muslim - in Islam you are considered ignorant'